In all our sanctuaries we sit at risk
  • Screen

    We search the screen for images

    but they come searching us.

    They are seeking our weak points.

    They want to win us.

    They reach for us

    through the screen

    antennae probing.

    They never see us.

    They cannot see.

     

    We peer at them

    through the screen

    trying to decipher

    their ploys, their deceptions

    their hidden purposes.

    The screen masks them

    and we cannot see.

     

    We prostrate ourselves

    at the screen’s foot

    and cry, Hail, Delusion !

    Posted:


  • Rule by Rude Boy ?

    What has been the effect upon UK citizens of the behaviour we have witnessed during the past few days, as negotiations over the planned televised debates between our political leaders appear to have reached their climax ?

    For me, the way Cameron/his Party/his hooligan Press have conducted themselves has been utterly astonishing. Obviously the Tory decision to avoid the debates was taken ages back, for mendacious reasons. The signals since that decision was made have been clear. It was based on a close calculation of party advantage, with no reference to, or respect for, democratic process, or the needs of democracy itself.

    This dodgy lot is not the first to have calculated on that basis, but the existence of precedents is no excuse, especially in our present climate of disenchantment with, and detachment from, politics and politicians. Cameron is actually not a coward and for opponents to call him one now is just to join the whole absurd charade, its script predicted and maybe even written in Tory Head Office. Cameron is a red-faced self-worshipper. He is also a calculating machine, utterly irresponsible, utterly without conscience. He is weighing his chances and trying his luck.

    But worse, the brazen manner with which this has been done, under so many eyes, the lazily transparent dishonesty of the long succession of ploys and alibis, have had a quality of their own. The original decision was a corrupt and cynical one. But the manner in which it has been implemented has been still more corrupt, if that were possible. There is absolute contempt operating here, and it is dangerous. Cameron and his street gang are making a nonsense of us all, of the political process, of what that process is for, of our language, of our nationhood.

    During the same week in which these contemptuous acts of hooliganism were taking place, we have witnessed the latest Prime Minister’s Question Time, which some have described as the most appalling yet. Repeatedly, the man occupying the high office of our Prime Minister did not see fit to answer our Opposition’s questions. To the orchestrated bayings of approval from the tail-wagging fox-hounds behind him, he merely chose his own topics to talk about, independent of the questions. More delinquent Bullington-boy abuse of our democracy, of due process shaped and developed over centuries. Whatever he can get awhy wiv, he will pursue. Knock it all dahn.

    I struggle with the meaning of this. What does it mean to be Cameron, or his supporters, doing what they are doing ? These are calculated policy decisions they have made, in order to win advantage. But at what cost to all of us, themselves included, their own party, their own children ? Are they not awake to any wider concern ?

    And what does it mean that people behaving in this rude-boy fashion, with the record they have of social fracture, injustice and division, deeply dubious austerity measures, savagely implemented, are level in the polls these days and might even win ?

    Do we assent, after all, to being ruled by an unrepentant street gang, sleek delinquents, posh hooligans ? Is that what is left to us ? Is that what is left of us ?

    In present conditions, the worship of self, of Me n’ Mine, the worship of the god of selfies, in defiance of community and trust, is similar if not the same as the ancient worship of Moloch. By all accounts, the ancient worship of Moloch required the burning to death of the nation’s first born, as propitiation. By the same token, if we do not want our children soon to die in a burning world, brought about by our greed and hooliganism, our maltreatment of Other, then we need to adopt a very different god from this baleful Me n’ Mine. The coming election is actually not a choice between left and right. It is a choice between gods.

    Put it another way : over the past five years, and now as they prepare to fight for re-election, the people who presently run this nation’s government have revealed very clearly who they are and how they view the electorate. Their behaviour is that of juvenile delinquents set loose in the playground, unsupervised and utterly arrogant. But they are also transparent (unless we are choosing to be blind). Therefore, if they win the election, they will do so only because the electorate has chosen to share with them their surrender to hooliganism, this nihilistic dance of death.

    It is as if we are all waiting for the adults to come home. Do we yearn for their arrival or do we dread it ? Will they come home in time ?

    Posted:


  • Truth or Lie – which to vote for in May ?

    For me, one of the best news items in recent days has been Peter Oborne’s resignation from The Telegraph on a point of principle.

    I hadn’t even heard his name before, but suddenly here he is, more prominent and sharply focused than almost anything else in the parade of parrot heads and slogans we are so used to.

    This respected man of apparently right wing views has accused The Telegraph of tailoring its news coverage to suit its own commercial interests, thereby betraying the trust of its readership. His headline example was The Telegraph’s reticence concerning the HSBC tax dodging scandal, in which the bank’s Swiss branch advised the rich of various nations on how to avoid their tax responsibilities. But Oborne has talked of this as just the last straw, the latest in a succession of signs of deterioration of various kinds. He has pointed the finger at The Telegraph Media Group’s present chief executive, Murdoch MacLennan, and The Telegraph’s owners, the beaming Barclay Brothers, Sir Frederick and Sir David, who live in a mock-Gothic castle on a small channel island called Brecqhou, near the island of Sark. These identical twins have a reputation for having sophisticated tax arrangements which include the use of at least one known tax haven.

    How refreshingly different from the common. A lone man of principle, skilled with words, using them powerfully, and having real impact. Taking on Big Money and Big Lie. The lonely sheriff who does not flinch as the clock ticks towards High Noon. Something clear and even noble emerges out of the usual foggy tissue of Sell and Spin and Sleaze.

    Is he a bit of a romantic, with an idealised vision of those better days at The Telegraph he cites, when apparently Truth was master, served faithfully at all levels of the operation ?

    Maybe, but it makes no odds if so. The principle he is stating is essential and transcends all else. Sell and Spin is an active wickedness and a cancer. Its creatures grow and grow in number and have spread imperceptibly and everywhere, way beyond The Telegraph and similar examples of our hooligan press, way beyond our hooliganised, our infantilised, House of Commons, that poisonous Westminster “bubble” which New Labour did so much to foster. Democracy and civilisation itself are threatened by Spin, the rule of the lie and of the liar. Without a shared currency of truth-telling, and the communal trust it engenders, our society is bankrupted and shattered and every individual in it is made a pauper and an outcast.

    So we owe this man our thanks. So do those of his colleagues who agree with his position and his decision to act, but did not act themselves and so must carry on in creature mode, silenced and colluding. He has shown them and the rest of us what being human means. The vision helps and lifts the spirits of the enslaved, the creatured.

    And let us note what this man of principle, with his tendency to identify himself with the right wing, has to say about Ed Miliband. Miliband is scorned and insulted on a regular basis by the orchestrated parrot heads and licensed rude-boys of the right, whom we now know so well. But this very month, in a piece in The Spectator, Oborne argued that Miliband has been a consistent and strong leader of the Opposition and, like Margaret Thatcher, has forged his own course, changing the terms of the debate on big business, foreign policy, Israel-Palestine and the power of the Murdoch press. He wrote that Miliband is the most accomplished Opposition leader since the Second World War.

    Compare that measured judgement to the puerile play-ground bully-boy insults usually hurled at Miliband by right-wingers, both press and politicians, all the way up to the sleek disgraceful operator presently polluting and demeaning the high office of UK Prime Minister.

    Oborne’s respect for Miliband makes you wonder, in passing, what he thinks of Cameron. More important, assuming he identifies himself as belonging towards the right of the political spectrum, what set of beliefs does Oborne, this man of obvious intelligence and integrity and high principle, associate with that place on the spectrum, so that he wants to stay there ? I see the present government of the UK as being in many respects the worst and most disgraceful there has been in my memory, perhaps ever. It is the blind and vicious leading the blind and irresponsibly gullible. And it is a government of the Right (on the one hand minutely restrained, and on the other largely abetted, by a few tame rabbits led by Clegg). Aside from this nightmare of hooliganism, lies and demented greed, is there, after all, somewhere on the right of the political spectrum that one could actually respect ? Can anything be built there ?

    In terms of numbers and institutional import, a larger recent event than Oborne’s resignation, with its strong words and reference to high principle, has been the Bishops’ letter in preparation for the coming UK general election. Some while ago, I wrote a post here, criticising the church for its low profile on issues that mattered. See :  http://www.roganwolf.com/publicsite/2012/07/08/where-is-the-church-i-dont-see-it-anywhere 

    Then the Roman Catholic Cardinal Nichols spoke up about food banks and used the word “disgraceful” to describe them and the need for them. (Instantly, Davey boy and his head pet rabbit leapt into camera shot and said Nichols was exaggerating). And I thought, aha, that’s better, I can see the Church now and it is speaking truth again. I wrote another post – http://www.roganwolf.com/publicsite/2014/02/24/thank-god-for-the-bishops/

    And now, with this latest very strong intervention, the Church and other faiths have made themselves even more correctly visible, in witness of the truth, with a statement of real strength (possibly implying a state of social emergency in doing so), and we can give thanks for Archbishop Welby as a man worthy of his calling and of his role.

    The Bishops’ letter is another reminder that there are such things as principle and values and community and they all matter centrally, and while it avoids taking political sides, it makes clear statements about social responsibility and concern for the poor. This of course has raised the hackles of some of the anti-social louts presently abusing the power that we the people have so tamely allowed them and again Davey-boy pops into focus and for a few moments claims a truer Christian witness than the Bishops’ own, in glibly refuting them. Then he dashes off to continue his depredations, his rending of our common weal and bindings, his kicking of the poor.

    And having reached this point, let us not forget a similar recent process, when the King’s Fund, a prestigious independent body, produced its report on the NHS. It declared that the Lansley changes which the Coalition Government had sprung on the electorate after coming into power (The Tories having kept their plans for the NHS back from their manifesto – a clear indication – surely – of contempt for democracy, for principle and for the British people), these changes had been – predictably – a disaster. In answer, the government spokesperson did not bat an eye-lid. The report, years in the preparing and written by experts, was simply wrong, the person said. And anyway, it had mentioned one or two positives and these were all that mattered. Reality is what it suits us it should be.

    Precisely so. Reality has become what it suits us it should be. And if reality doesn’t suit our purposes, or our purses, or our comfort, we’ll bat it away and pretend it’s something else. We will spin it into whatever shape might serve us.

    Oborne objected to The Telegraph putting its own commercial interests before its duty to truth and fact and its community. Nah nah nah, was the answer. You’re wrong. Sleep on. Your nightmare is now. Cardinal Nichols and the bodies he represents objected to the scandal of the food banks in the UK. Nah nah nah, was the answer. You’re wrong. Sleep on. Your nightmare is now. The King’s Fund demonstrated vividly a disastrous fragmenting of the NHS, weakening it when it should have been strengthened. Nah nah nah was the answer. You’re wrong. Sleep on. Your nightmare is now.  The Bishops and other faith leaders objected to irresponsible political game playing that has encouraged scapegoating and the abuse of the poor and the stranger, for political ends. Nah nah nah, was the answer. You’re wrong. Sleep on. Your nightmare is now.

    And what will be the UK electorate’s answer, on election day ?

    Will we wake up in time ? Do we want to ? Do we dare ? Or do we prefer our present sleep, our present nightmare ?

    Posted:


  • What is this world? What asketh men to have ?

    There was once a teacher whose words had unusual power. Crowds gathered wherever he spoke.  But somehow and at the same time, his mere presence seemed to threaten all order and decorum in the city.  With wonderful persuasiveness, he seemed to be calling a whole way of life into question. He was advocating change, astonishing change.

    He taught that the quality of your life and your significance as a human being were not to be measured by which gods you worshipped as compared to other gods, or which possessions you owned as compared to other possessions.

    He proclaimed that there was just one central truth, one light, that stood before all of humankind. It was not for mere humans to choose between gods, different gods for each tribe, or region, or tradition, or aspect of life. It was a plain fact from which no human could escape that. just as there was but one Creation, so there was but one Creator and all of humankind derived from that one source, that one beginning.

    And this in turn called into question the value of material gain as an aim in human life, once you had enough for your own needs and those of your family. In fact, any way of life which aimed at pampering self, in competition with others, was a distraction and even a wickedness. Human beings were born not for the world to serve them, but for them to serve the will of their Creator, in step with the dance of Creation. So the teacher preached against acquisition and accumulation for its own sake and, instead, urged and prescribed generosity towards the poor and the needy, kind treatment and emancipation of slaves, and equality between men and women before God. For all human beings were made common by a plain and irrefutable fact that there was but one Creator and all being is derived from that one source.

    The teacher said that what mattered was not what you possessed in your own walled spaces, distinct from others, but how you behaved in the space between yourself and others, as a fellow-citizen and neighbour ; so that an over-riding urge to wealth and comfort was actually an anti-social and destructive force ; and any wealth and comforts you possessed that were superfluous to your needs, you should give away to those who lacked a sufficiency.

    The longer he spoke, the more the city walls shook and trembled. The wealthy and privileged who lived in their palaces and behind their high walls, plotting together on how to avoid paying the taxes required for the community’s use and betterment, how to curry favour with the local rulers and their entourages, how to climb the prestige ladder, saw that their world was about to collapse around them. They were proud of feeling better than and different from all the poor people outside their high-built walls. And this teacher seemed about to blow those walls down.

    So they went to the teacher’s uncle and guardian and sought to threaten and bribe him. Give us the teacher so that we may kill him, they said. Otherwise he will bring chaos to the city.

    But the teacher’s uncle refused.

    They said, we will give the teacher treasure if he complies with us, such treasure that he won’t be able to refuse. Look at it. Now pass it to him. They thought this would persuade him. But still the uncle refused. He said that while this treasure might mean a great deal to the rich people who were offering it, it would mean nothing at all to the teacher. They were trying to silence him by means of their own bankrupt currency. Their bribes had no meaning, no weight and no value.

    So with guile, good fortune and through the courage and wisdom of his supporters, the teacher continued his preaching and his witness. He preached and proclaimed in the city and far beyond. He died many deaths along the way.

    His name was Muhammad.

     

    (NB the title of this piece has nothing to do with what is a traditional Muslim story. The title comes from one of Geoffrey Chaucer’s “Canterbury Tales.” Specifically, the words can be found in Part IV, lines 1919 – 1921, of “The Knight’s Tale” and are spoken by the knight Arcite, as he lies dying). 

    Posted:


  • Who’s to Blame for our Condition ? Who can we Accuse ?

    Shall we blame Foreigners ? Oh yes, let’s. It’s all those Eurocrats and Asylum Seekers. Those Ukranians. Those Poles. Those Australians. Those “ethnics.” Foreigners are all liars and criminals. Well, let’s pretend they are, anyway. It’s comforting to feel under siege. It makes you surer of your ground.

    And shall we blame Poor People too ? People dependent on a benevolent State ? People in a weak position ? Oh yes, let’s. They’re all skivers, all workshy. That’s a lie, of course. But so what ? It’s comforting. Let’s grab the lie and wack ’em with it. Let’s make them foreign in our minds and give ’em a kicking. It will cheer us up. It’ll make us feel surer of our ground.

    People outside a particular and familiar ring. People beyond the pale. Easy targets. Let’s get ’em. Then we few can feel that we’re all in this together. In a ring and under siege. Hitting out at the besiegers.

    Or shall we blame the politicians who should fix everything, but do not ? Who should speak to us from the heart but merely mouth their lines at us, treating us like children, treating us like the enemy without, treating us as just fodder for their sleek and poisonous propaganda ?

    And then, after treating us like children, they behave like adolescent hooligans themselves, squealing yah-boo in public in ways that we would punish them for if we were their parents. And they in turn join the blame-game, in their adolescent way, turning the House of Commons into a poorly supervised school playground  :

    Mumsy, it’s not me. It’s him. It’s Them. The international financial crisis precipitated by the misbehaviour of certain banks around the world was all Gordon’s fault, Mumsy. Blame him. And Ed. And Ed. Them others. Not me. I’m a good boy. So is Georgie-boy. And him over there, on the other side, he’s a waste of space, Mumsy. Love me, not him. I’m the one for you, Mumsy. Just look at the way I point at dead fish in foreign places in the Summer-time. It proves I was born to lead, Mumsy. Throw me your favour.

    Once upon a time, people burned witches. Especially in times of heightened anxiety. Especially along uncertain frontiers.  It was comforting.

    In some aspects we have advanced since then. These days, for instance, we can sit a space-craft down on a comet. In other aspects, it seems,  we have advanced not a millimetre. Our children will pay for that.

    In our anxiety we retreat into a ring of anger and look to make someone outside it pay. As if that will solve the problem. As if that will magic away the cause of our anxiety.

    In my own ring, I find myself raging at my country’s political leaders to the point of hatred. My contempt for Cameron et al is already leaking into this piece and I have to ask myself, am I not just joining the witch-hunt ? Where The Express seeks to whip up prejudice against foreigners, where the Mail seeks to whip up prejudice against people it calls “the Workshy” and where Davey-boy blames Gordon in a sustained attempt to blind people into supporting the Tory cuts and Austerity policies, leading them away from the facts and away from their saner selves, am I not equally scapegoating Davey-boy – for things over which he actually has no control, things which, even were he a far better and more honourable statesman and citizen and human being than he is, he could not do much to ameliorate ?

    And I have to answer, yes, probably, to an extent. The extent of the intensity cannot entirely be due to the man and his actions. I yearn for his defeat in May, and for everything he apparently stands for, but under a different less smoothly loutish and socially divisive and destructive group of political leaders, will the world be that much safer ? Will humankind be any closer to salvation ? Will our futures look significantly more redolent of hope ? We are who we are and maybe in this generation we are merely discovering that who we are as a species is a hopeless case.  Davey-boy, Head Rude-boy of Blingland, is just a reminder of a wider cause for despair. He is who we deserve, maybe. He is us, maybe. He occupies a space that we have left for him. It is finally our doing that at this juncture the high office of Prime Minister of the UK is occupied by a sleek sociopathic salesman of rotten cabbages whom significant numbers of us continue to find plausible, against the evidence of five years’ worth of harm he has done to this country, to its structures and to its soul.

    And here I think is my justification. In the circumstances, I am looking too much to a mere political leader to rescue us, to have all the answers, to work miracles, to be genuinely inspirational ; and I have no right to blame that leader for what is actually human nature, the limitations, frailties and fallibility from which none us is free ; but in our present situation of tumult, fragmentation and uncertainty, conditions which call for the best and wisest and most generous in all of us, I am justified in blaming that leader for seeking as often as the present one does to work on and encourage and ride upon the worst in all of us, for his own benefit. And the lies keep coming, carefully coined, smoothly delivered. The lies alone signify a contempt for and distance from the nation he keeps lying to, that makes him dangerous to it. Each new lie is a further drop of poison in the reservoir of our democracy and our community. Neither democracy nor community can survive without trust. And as any parent will tell any child, lies destroy trust and make speaking in words pointless.

    So, in the circumstances, I am looking for worthy political leadership with greater need and expectation than perhaps is quite justifiable ; but what the present leadership has provided for the past five years is an attack across the board upon all the values I hold dear and on all the ties which in my opinion hold us together as a Society and are the soil and spring-board for any real recovery that we might hope for. A vacuum has grown and grown. The words we seek continue to fail. The ways forward we reach for keep failing to materialise. The present leader has not led. He has merely postured and kicked out. There has been no recovery of anything of worth. He has merely shown us, time after time, in himself, what the problem is. If we were in doubt before of what we stand for and where we are going, we are in utter bewilderment now. Values have been thrown to the winds. As a nation in 2015, we stand for nothing we can be proud of, only self and self-seeking, deceitfulness and greed. We have been spun into utter emptiness and delinquency at all levels. Our own children have cause to be very frightened of us.

    How can we ever fully understand ourselves, the tides and currents that swirl in our systems ? Perhaps also there is a kind of well in me which has been breached, concerning people who are vulnerable. Connecting with the vulnerable, the outsider, is a kind of well-spring for me and explains much of my working life. This government has laid into the vulnerable virtually from the start, making political capital from something unworthy and destructive in human nature which it had a duty, as the government of a civilised country, to oppose. Instead it cultivated the fissure, encouraged the misinformation, indulged itself in the prejudices of its natural supporters, and moved in and began to bully, claiming virtue in so doing. There can be no excuse, no justification. I see it as a criminal offence.

    One more line of thought : politics can arouse passions and for all its limitations can have a massive impact on many people’s lives. Witness the Bedroom Tax. This is Caesar’s world, after all. Caesar can kill in all manner of ways. Give unto Caesar what is Caesar’s due.

    But where is God in this ? Or religion ? Or the faith that goes with both ?

    Are the worlds of God and Caesar so very distinct ? There is much that can be said in answer, but I shall limit myself to a few thoughts and then I shall offer a couple of names for a new god.

    Faith which is normally associated with religion can also be applied to secular movements, to political means and ends. Thus, people can believe in certain politics, certain governmental policies and ideas and creeds, with religious fervour. So those ventures become something other than mere human constructs and rational attempts of the possible. They become Right (or Wrong) ; they become Good (or Bad) ; they become attempts to correct (or corrupt) human living. They become objects of worship. They attract devotees, some of whom may be fanatical.

    And my name for this new god is Me n’ Mine. Another name is Number One.  In turn, this god reminds me of other false gods I have heard of – Baal and Moloch. They occur in the Old Testament and are associated there with idolatry, enemies of the chosen people. They are also associated with child sacrifice. Devotees propitiated the god by sacrificing to him their own children. Flaubert gives an appalling description of one such imagined ceremony in his novel “Salammbô”. The children were burnt alive within the brazen statue of the god.

    Come to think of it, Number One is not such a new god after all. Mammon has been around for quite a while, attracting devotees, enjoying his creatures.

    But this false god, however we name it, is not just our own figment, our own blank canvas. It has reality, real force. It works upon and within each one of us, strengthening the worst in us, weakening the best. Some of us become its creatures, its orcs, wholly overwhelmed and overtaken. I think it originates in fear.

    But only in this generation has the worship of Mammon actually threatened the next generation of humanity with death from global burning. Maybe this is another reason for the intensity of my hatred of the present government. It is a government of faith. Its creatures worship Me an’ Mine/”Number One”/Mammon/Baal/Moloch. Their faith is blind. And they are dangerous.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Posted:


  • Wrestling with my Shadow

     

    My shadow dogs my path. It dwarfs me,

    this daemon, this desolate god.

    Could I live shadow-free ?

    Would I fly ?

    What would be left of me ?

     

    Here are some more thoughts on the shadow :

     

    First Sightings

     

    I can say this with real pride :

    no one but I

    throws my shadow.

     

    I call it my under-self, my field

    of operation. I cannot

    call it home.

     

    I glimpse it sometimes, usually at night,

    leaping the wet rocks

    as the tall seas break and pursue ;

     

    or poised for a moment of a bare grey tree-stump

    calm after that stoop for eternity

    out of the wind, the clutch of the mist ;

     

    or sidling with gleeful expertise

    through the ranks of the juggernauts –

    that blind, brutal caravan…

     

    My Shadow at Bedside

     

    My shadow leaps on me

    each time I sleep –

    to devour me.

    Yet still my mornings

    find me whole

    and at each waking

    there my shadow hangs

    like empty sacking

    against my wall –

    wholly at my disposal.

     

    Kiss of the Dark Angel

     

    The dark angel of my dreams

    was dreadfully beautiful

     

    lithe and invincible

    and faceless

     

    sans eyes sans mouth

    his head like a smooth bulb

     

    dark and gleaming.

    I knew I could not hope

     

    to escape and yes

    here he comes pouring

     

    up the stone steps

    by the sea-shore, the waves

     

    wild behind him

    straight up at me

     

    outwitting me without effort

    in our life-long race,

     

    glorious in his searing energy.

    I submit, powerless and rapt

     

    as the lipless angel kisses me

    taking my face.

     

    Escape Bid

     

    How have I allowed

    my shadow to grow so tall ?

    It rises from my lamp

    like a vast giggling genie.

    “Your wish is my command,

    O Master,” my genie roars.

    And I quail.

     

    It winks at me

    each evening

    and for that moment

    I see nothing

    anywhere in the world.

     

    I threw my shadow

    all over town –

    It leaned across at me

    from each echoing underpass

    from each foul lift-shaft

    from each despairing alley-way.

     

    I scattered my shadow like seed

    across the fields –

    and the seed bounded from the earth

    like a mob of heroes

    who chased me and harried me

    and reduced me before the whole world.

     

    I caught my shadow by the throat

    and flung it into a pit

    and packed the pit with sand

    boulders and rich cement

    and when all had set

    hard as rock

     

    I turned to escape, shrieking with relief –

    a hand formed of new rock

    siezed my heel.

    I stood there above my pit

    locked in my shadow.

     

    Three-way Encounter between Me, my Shadow                                  and the dread lord Number One

     

    I have this enemy

    my “inveterate foe”

    my enemy Number One.

     

    Whenever we meet, my enemy

    wastes me. I become zero.

    All meaning drains from me.

     

    I become a flatness on the road

    a vague ugliness in the air

    an abortion. And I have nothing

     

    I can call on, no wild cards

    no reserve forces, no hidden energies

    to throw into the field.

     

    I call my enemy “Number One.”

    I don’t know what it looks like

    for it borrows any form

     

    it chooses. And is it “He ?” or “She ” ?

    It is random and boundless.

    It is All. All is “It.”

     

    And I never have warning

    of an encounter. No clouds

    of dust on the horizon,

     

    no slow rumble of feet, no tensing

    of greased muscle, no pause in sound.

    Simply my shadow deserts me.

     

    *********************

     

    And suddenly I lose my footing.

    My ground just goes, my hold on space.

    I look about me. I’m not here.

     

    I reach for anything I have

    anything that makes me

    anything that marks and shapes me.

     

    I reach for my history

    my unique possession –

    it’s gone it’s an empty lift shaft.

     

    I reach for my voice

    my shaping words my answer my shriek –

    and the words give in the wind

     

    and all my forming my bite on the air

    collapses like a slack sail

    like a shower of teeth.

     

    I reach for my rage my saving grace –

    and find nothing but a gasping franticness

    an incapacity, a self-immolation

     

    and all that comes of my rage

    for survival is a rush to give ground

    and yield all to the poised advance of my destroyer.

     

    I writhe in the air like a foreign element

    marooned here here above ground

    hanging like a fish by the tail

     

    held in triumph one Summer’s evening.

    I am a transparency held to the sunlight

    open to any examination.

     

    *********************

     

    And I cry to my shadow

    “Why now ?” Why desert me

    now ? Each breath of my life

     

    I have sought to escape you

    to fly weightless

    to exist in pure mind

     

    to secure utter distinctness

    to achieve eternity.

    Must now be the time I at last succeed

     

    now when I need your earth ?

    For my infidelity

    you desert me to our ruin.”

     

    And Number One, deep in its steel case

    lashing at forests, at continents, at cities,

    befouling ocean, air-wave, blood-stream,

     

    raising hordes

    of zealots to slaughter their fellows

    in the name of a phantasm

     

    breeding the will to deceive,

    tending the urge to piracy and plunder

    nurturing despair, aiding inertia

     

    working deep in, working slowly

    to the very core, paring

    particularising, severing, numbering

     

    Number One turns from its vast enterprise

    hissing in glee

    at my distress

     

    and whispers :

    “From whence do you consider

    stem my victories?”

     

    Last Word

     

    …My shadow carries my shape and moves with my movements. But it has no features and it never speaks ; and all sorts of strange forms or colours could be hidden in its darkness. Its shape keeps shifting and often it simply disappears. But then it returns. When I am happy I dance and with me my shadow dances. We dance together. When I am ill at ease, I labour and constantly I look back in dread and see my shadow pursuing me, threatening me.

    Sometimes, then, my shadow seems to be my loyal and faithful friend, at others my implacable and inescapable enemy. To befriend my shadow would appear to be essential if I am to live successfully here on Earth.

    If someone or something overshadows me, I receive immediate protection from the Sun and am relieved of the immense responsibility of my own shadow. On the other hand I am weakened, deprived of my energy and autonomy. It is as if my shadow has been stolen from me, eaten up by a stronger force.

    And this in turn implies that my shadow is an important energy source and that I should retain that energy by insisting on my personal independence. Accordingly I must allow nothing and no one to overshadow me. For the Earth is sick and any creative source of energy which can retain wholeness must now devote itself to restoring the Earth.

    © Rogan Wolf

     

    Posted:


  • I and Thou and Charlie

    In the early 1990’s, I wrote a series of poems called “I hyphen Thou”. The poems explored the image of the hyphen and were suggested by a book by the philosopher/theologian Martin Buber called “I and Thou.”

    The idea of the hyphen is an old favourite of mine. In fact I run a small charity called Hyphen-21.

    Literally, the hyphen is a dash on the page and connects words. But in Buber’s wonderful book, the hyphen also connects Me to Thee, I to Thou, I – Thou.

    Bewilderingly, miraculously, I am the centre of the universe, in my experience, for my time.

    If I choose, I can treat you as just a shadow, or object, or obstruction, or tool, or target, from a place of callous detachment. I – It.

    But in doing so, I shut myself down in some way, as well as you down.

    As an alternative, I can choose to see and treat you as being equally as central in the universe as I am. If I do so, I am of course realising the truth about you, as well as about me. I – Thou.

    And maybe, in a world of ever accelerating change and flux, the hyphen that connects us, in this awareness and realisation, is the only solid ground that now remains. The skills of connection are therefore the most central human skills of all. However, in present conditions, the urge to disconnect becomes more and more powerful.

    Social workers, nurses, teachers, artists and the like use the skills of human connection all the time, however inadequately. The skills of love and of community (see earlier posts on this blog, especially this one). But too many politicians and other world leaders, as well as terrorists, as well as most of the rest of us between those positions, are attacking, perverting and poisoning, all the time, these skills which we need so desperately in order to sustain a human community on Earth.

    In the last few hours, thinking of Charlie,  I have been going over the “I hyphen Thou” poems and finding they speak for and to me as vividly as ever, and perhaps even more pressingly than when I wrote them twenty years ago. Here are some excerpts :

     

    Riding the Hyphen between I and Thou

    Through the débris we ride our hyphen
    our kite in the hurricane
    our dry leaf on the last day

    Unnameable fragments swirl about our ears
    and rage unanswerable
    and pain unhealable and unredeemable

    Through the débris we ride our hyphen
    our kite in the hurricane
    our dry leaf on the last day

    What would you bid for a berth on the Ark
    for a last communion in the whole aching night
    where there’s warmth and trust and a roof above your head
    as the world of our failure is unmade ?

    Unnameable fragments swirl about our ears
    and rage unanswerable
    and pain unhealable and unredeemable.

    Through the débris we ride our hyphen
    our kite in the hurricane
    our dry leaf on the last day.

     

    The Holds I hang from

    Lost among glimpses
    among surfaces among scatterings
    at loose within the leaping disasters
    of an immeasurable universe

    we are the makers
    of our own safe ground
    the stillness upon which we stand
    is all ours to build.

    Like a climber who negotiates
    the overhang
    I carry my footholds
    the footholds which only I can construct
    are all that preserve me.
    In view of my exposure, however,
    I must also attend to the rock
    I owe it to myself
    to take care
    of the holds I hang from.

    The fact of my knowledge of you
    is far more a certainty
    than the fact of me…..

     

    The Hyphen as Surf-board

    …The Earth is made raw
    goaded past endurance
    and none bar the surfer

    will survive its onslaught
    leaping the crazed beast
    as it rages and grieves

    in some ancient dance
    of despairing beauty
    for there’s nothing left

    to follow now
    but the wild wild blue.
    I shall learn to land-surf

    to keep my feet
    all I can claim of the world
    is here to feet.

    The city heaves and buckles
    squealing and trumpeting
    gathering pace

    it hastens me
    it drives me forward
    it tunnels me like a curling wave.

    Let me not stumble
    let me keep my feet
    let me ride it through

    let my little board
    dash me
    steadily through.

     

    from Hyphen Loitering (with intent)

    …I believe today I almost met someone.
    For just a few moments, possibly,
    the whirring edge of me
    disturbed some surface of attention.

    Perhaps in time I’ll risk being still enough
    actually to meet a whole person.
    I wonder would either of us survive
    the awe and enormity of true encounter.

    I loiter here between lines of thunder
    poised for the sudden break
    the momentary opening
    my own hushed moment of interruption.

    I must learn to do without lines.
    As soon as a line is drawn
    defeat there becomes possible
    and even perhaps significant.

    There is no excuse for defeat
    and significance is wasted there.
    To be invincible
    you need do nothing
    but dance at all times…..

     

    Rogan Wolf

    Posted:


  • The Space Between

    All that matters of me
    resides outside my skin.

    Here
    I am dross

    an eye-lid’s flicker
    but where we meet

    and what we make there
    shall never leave the Earth.

    We have to make precious
    the space between us.

    It is humanity’s
    last hope.

    Our medium is diamonds
    if only we will shape them.

                                                        Rogan Wolf

     

    Posted: