In all our sanctuaries we sit at risk
  • A Letter to my MP

     

     

    My local MP is new to politics, was recently a lawyer and is a Tory. The following is a copy of a letter I sent to that person quite recently. (I have had a reply since, which I found of no account, and I shall not bother to reproduce it here). Now, this afternoon, our toy Prime minister Mr Johnson has headed off on his unicorn to wrest singlehandedly some fantasy Brexit grail from them foreigners and I am uploading this letter of mine as the best comment I can make on this bad dream.

    “I am writing to you as my MP, though not with any request. I do not share your politics but…. think that you would agree with me that, as an MP, you can benefit from hearing the views of all your constituents – not just those who support your own party.

    I am a poet and ex social worker. As poet, I run a project called “Poems for…the wall.” It has been going for 20 years and offers poems by many authors for display in places like schools and healthcare waiting rooms, free of charge. And as social worker, I used to run community centres in London for people with mental health problems.

    Perhaps as a result of that background, I tend to see psychology – how people tick – as being behind much of what happens in human affairs, including politics. And I find words important, and consider language to be a currency as fundamental to civilised society as money. And both currencies need to be sound and clean and trustworthy if our community is to stay afloat, vigorous, safe and fulfilling for our children. 

    So you will probably not be surprised to hear that I am finding life under Mr Johnson’s leadership quite onerous and disturbing. The nation has chosen to ignore his extraordinary record of being sacked twice for lying, as if dishonesty doesn’t matter. I am confused about many things, but clear on this : dishonesty does matter and a failure to tell the truth, on the part of an accountable politician (see Nolan Principle, number six) is an abuse of the common weal and a crime against a sovereign people. It is a crime on a level with theft and fraud, and, further, those who support a politician who lies are accessory to that crime. More recently, we have to take on board Mr Johnson’s willingness to break international law with his Internal Market Bill, thereby shaming and disgracing and further reducing this country, but winning his own MPs’ support in doing so, even the ex-lawyers among them. For me, these are times, not just of high anxiety, but of deep shame.

    [Since the letter was written, Mr Johnson has of course offered to withdraw the legislation that would have made Great Britain a rogue state. This lordly gesture no doubt impressed someone, maybe even my MP, who supported the legislation. But for me, the deep shame remains].

    I would like to leave you with these two links, both to posts on my blog. Each consists mostly of poetry. Here is the first :  https://roganwolf.com/2020/10/22/what-does-great-britain-stand-for-these-days/ The second is in a traditional English verse form called “rhyme royal,” and provides a commentary on the process by which this nation exited the EU : https://roganwolf.com/2020/10/22/words-for-the-earthquake/

    Yours sincerely,

    Posted:


  • Message to Keir Starmer

    Dear Keir Starmer,

    I’m a Labour member and a strong supporter and admirer of your leadership. I am sending this email message – and will upload a copy on my blog – fully aware that there is no prospect that you will read it. But, maybe, one of your team will.

    I can see, of course, that a Brexit Deal would be better than a Brexit No Deal. But should Labour therefore actually support a Deal, (assuming that Johnson’s oven will eventually cough up some indigestible mess or other) ? Doing so would of course be seen and used as a statement of the Party’s support for Brexit, making it available to share the blame, when the true consequences at last hit home. This is an extremely difficult call to make. But I think that for Labour to support any Brexit at all would be both wrong and politically unwise.

    I don’t always agree with Alistair Campbell, but respect him ; he knows his way around and, writing recently on this issue, was at his most disciplined and impressive ; he was also simply right (his piece was in “The Independent” and may not be accessible to a non-member. But I recommend it to anyone who hasn’t seen it) : https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/labour-boris-johnson-brexit-deal-b1763806.html

    And I agree wholeheartedly with Neil Kinnock here :  https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/dec/04/neil-kinnock-backing-brexit-deal-politically-lethal-for-labour  Let Johnson and the Tories be made to own the disgrace and disaster they have brought on this country. They alone. That way lies the nation’s best hope of recovery.

    These two pieces make the points better than I can and with rather more authority. I would just add the following : Brexit is not really an argument at all, not a policy, not a strategy, not an answer, not a sustainable future.   It is delusion land, lie land, regressive escapism and scapegoating, a going rogue, out of which some dishonest or deluded politicians and press barons are seeking to make profit. Yet the nation is split on the issue, and Johnson is consequently Prime Minister, as if Brexit and “Global Britain” etc belong in the real world, the light of day, among the adults. Like Trumpism, they don’t. They are chaos running loose. And Labour should not engage with the present puerile “deal or no deal” theatricals, because doing so would just add to those shadows on the wall, those phantom shapes playing in the nursery, claiming to belong under the sun. Brexit will disappoint at best, deal or no deal. Then at last we shall meet reality, rather than continue to waste our energies arguing over a bunch of projected shadows. Let reality do the talking. And let Labour have its powder dry for when that reality has sunk in and people can see it for themselves, see the lie and the fraud and see the liars and the fraudsters. Then there will be work to do.

    One other thing. That “Red Wall” argument. Erstwhile Labour supporters have joined the delusion, bewitched by this Etonian pied piper, with his wearisome smirk and hair akimbo. And it is almost certainly they who will be hit hardest of all by Johnson’s wretched take-away Brexit wrapped in his fantasies. But Labour’s role is absolutely not to join this ghastly dance among the shadows. That would not be true “listening,” nor “Democracy.” It would simply be betrayal. Betrayal of the truth. Betrayal of what Labour really stands for. Betrayal of all its supporters.

    In conclusion, here’s a proposal I have made before : we have surely seen by now what the Lie can do, in the mouths of unworthy “leaders” like Trump and Johnson, felon chancers, leathery narcissists rising to the surface in these times of (highly justified) anxiety, when people are perhaps more prone than usual to follow the false. Let Labour make it policy for lying in politics to become illegal. The Nolan Principles are essentially toothless. Let at least the sixth principle be given teeth. There is no sufficient alternative and, post-Brexit, this would surely be a vote-winner.

    Best wishes

    Rogan Wolf

    Posted:


  • Let’s Hear it from Janus on the Union

     

    The Roman god Janus had two heads, two faces. They are usually depicted as looking in opposite directions.

    And the UK has a Gaffe man and a lying Toad for Prime Minister. He says, “Call me Boris” but perhaps “Call me Janus” would ring a little truer. And those two heads are not only turned in opposite directions – all too often their voices are articulating opposite views both at the same time, both dishonest.

    And there he was with his two heads at Prime Minister’s Questions the other day, each head with its studiously unruly mop of straggly yellowness on top, speaking about the union of nations and the dangers of nationalism. Really ?

    He was talking to the Right Honourable Ian Blackford (SNP Leader at Westminster) and was referring with curious pride to his own time as Mayor of London. He said that, as Mayor of a devolved administration, he had focussed on the real priorities of the people of London – not on constitutional issues.

    Absolutely, Mr Toad. That’s just the ticket. Focus on the real priorities of the people. Constitutional issues aimed at severing union and bound to make co-operative action harder are an unforgiveable irrelevance and distraction, a mutual weakening of capacity. Absolutely, Mr Toad, our straggly Janus.

    And, still facing in a Scottish direction, this pro-union Toad went on to lecture the Right Honourable Blackford that what the UK does collectively is far far better that what it could do as a group of separate and competing nations. The union has shown its value and will continue to show it value, he said.

    Well, Mr Toad, you said it again. What any union of nations does collectively, what the European Union does collectively, is far far better than separate nations can ever do, acting alone.

    He’s so right, you know, Or is he right only in that northern-facing, Scottish direction ?

    And then the Toad said that the SNP would take Scotland back into the European Union ! Horrors ! What could be more appalling that to join a union of nearly 30 countries ? What a massive surrender of POWER, said another of those straggly Janus heads. You lose POWER when you join a Union, said the head.

    And little England will be squeezed in the middle, whispered another of Toad’s heads. All through history, being caught between France and Scotland has been one of little England’s nightmares.

    And the Right Honourable Keir Starmer seemed none too impressed with this Lying Toad, our fraud of a Prime Minister with his several straggly heads, each muddly and duplicitous. And the Right Honourable Keir Starmer asked across the dispatch box, do the collective straggly Toads opposite all not agree that, actually, Scotland needs more devolution, not less ?

    And one of the straggly heads declared that Tony Blair had admitted that devolution was a mistake, that Blair had not foreseen that nationalism, would rise up on the back of it. And who wants nationalism, said the straggly head ?

    We want nationalism said another head perched on the same body. But only our nationalism, not your nationalism. Only our union. Not your union. And our control. Not yours. And our POWER. Not yours. Nor Parliament’s. Nor the People’s. Not the British. Nor even the English.

    MINE, said Janus, speaking with one voice at last.

    Rule Britannia. Rule my Make-Believe Britannia. Rule Toad’s Britannia. The chaotic and shameless immorality of Toad’s Toyland.

     

    Posted:


  • What a Funny Time to say Goodbye to the Chaos Maistro

     

    So now, suddenly, it’s off with his head, the maestro, that shiny hate-filled spear-head of Brexit. He conducted his own removals, exiting through the front door of course, in full view of the cameras, delivering insult to the last. Not so long ago, a raucous parrot I know, a “bird of paradise” who insists on the liberty to speak, had some short, sharp comments to make on that genius familar perched on Mr Johnson’s shoulder (without whom our Mr Toadie thought he could not do). Here below are six of them (and they even rhyme) :

     
     
     

    Posted: