In all our sanctuaries we sit at risk
  • The “Poems for…” project – a new collection has been uploaded , crossing new frontiers

    A new collection of mainly bilingual poems has been uploaded on the Poems for… website. It consists of sixty poems, most of them bilingual.

    Eventually this sixty will join and become one with the collection of forty five poems  launched a few years ago, called “Poems for… One World.”

    The new collection has taken three years. Thank you, Stephen Watts, yet again, for guidance, counsel and support.

    Thirty different languages are represented. They include six poems written in African languages spoken south of the Sahara – Ewe, Igbo, Somali, Tigrinya, Afrikaans, /Xam  (though /Xam is no longer in live currency).  Six is not enough and we’ll come again at this one.

    But this time there is also some variation on the collection’s main theme – the simple  exchange on a single page between two languages – between “foreign” and “incomprehensible”, and familar and clear. The crossing over from one to the other.

    For instance, the new collection includes a poem called “These are the Hands” by Michael Rosen, until recently the UK Children’s Poet Laureate. People at the UK National Health Service commissioned him to write it in celebration of the 60th birthday of the NHS a couple of years ago.

    I asked whether we could add the poem to our collection and send it round our mailing list. Of course we could, he said.

    Then I asked, would he agree to me getting it translated into various languages as well, particularly languages of people often in conflict or in question ?  Of course he would.

    So in the new collection there are four versions of the poem, besides his own – in Punjabi, in Turkish, in Greek, in Somali. And soon I hope to add other languages too – such as Arabic and Hebrew.

    The point is obvious. People sit quietly together in NHS waiting rooms, sharing their common human precariousness and mortality, who back in their own places of origin might be seeking each other’s lives.

    A few days ago,  I showed the different versions of his poem to Michael, who was excited. I told him I have to fund-raise now, to keep the project going and he asked if I would like a quote from him, in support. Of course I would, I said.

    He sent it over minutes later and here it is : “I think that this is a stimulating, exciting and important project. We all need to be able to talk to each other and we need to be able to talk to each other about things that matter. I wrote the NHS poem firstly because I was asked to but more importantly because I care deeply about the NHS. My parents fought for it, it brought my children into the world, it saw my mother and father out of it with care and dignity – and much more besides. The people who work for the NHS come from all over the world and the NHS cares for people whose origins are all over the world. It is a truly international, inter-communal, inter-cultural institution. How right then that what we say within the NHS can, when appropriate, talk multi-lingually. I am excited and delighted that my poem might appear in several languages. It shows that we can talk to each other just as we try to care for each other. I think the project needs all the help it can find.”

    But there are other variations, hinging on the meaning of the word “frontier.” Frontiers are not just geographical, nor lingual, nor cultural.

    There is a frontier in me between life and death. I am afraid to cross that frontier.

    There is a frontier in all of us – I suggest – between mental well-being and mental ill-being. We are almost as afraid to cross that frontier as the one that divides life and death, and our fear affects our behaviour the closer to the frontier we find ourselves.

    So in this new collection there are pairs of poems in English which seek to speak clearly across this other kind of frontier, in the cause of better connection. A pair of poems by someone who this year died of an aggressive terminal cancer, and kept recording it all in verse, almost to the last minute, and humorous to the last. A pair of poems by someone also recently dead, who was seriously physically disabled himself and was campaigning to the last and with high effectiveness for disability rights. A pair of poems about someone with Downs Syndrome. A pair of poems by children. A pair of poems by people familiar with the inside of  psychiatric units…

    Each one of these pairs could become a whole collection in its own right, if we can get the funding…

    Fund-raising needs alone require me to seek publicity for these 60 poems. But I  think they  simply deserve to be known and read, deserve on their merits maximum possible exposure.  And even without publicity, I know that they will be downloaded in large numbers, in the UK and all over the world. They will go mostly to schools, but also to public libraries, healthcare waiting rooms, embassies, prisons – and not just in the UK.

    I know this, because we can keep track of the downloads from the site.  And we have the e-mail addresses of everyone who registers there. There are well over 1,000 names on our mailing list. At the very least we shall be telling everyone on that list that the new poems are available.

    I think this project is powerful and it is necessary. For poetry can speak to people beneath the skin, it can penetrate armour, it can speak straight to you where your average advertising copy merely works on or round you, diminishing you. I wasn’t 100% impressed by the recent advertising campaign in the UK, seeking to liberalise social attitudes to mental ill-health, for instance. Huge sums of money were made available for it. What a wonderful opportunity. But the main result seems to have been just more advertising copy, often simplistic and even misleading,  to join the daily cacophony of advert-speak. I’m not convinced it does that much.

    Posted:


  • Riding the Hyphen – but to what effect ?

    I run a small charity called Hyphen-21 and January can be an anxious month, with accounts and reports needed by the Charity Commissioners no later than the 31st. But I actually enjoyed writing the report this year. It clarified a few ideas and its overview brought out some pattern and coherence to what usually just feels a lonely scattering and confusion of effort, effort too often thwarted. Here is a quote from the report I quite like :

    “The charity Hyphen-21 is founded on the proposition that community not merely exists and matters, but a healthy and inclusive community is essential to each individual’s welfare, meaning and survival. By definition, community means relationship and connection. Therefore, if community is to survive, the skills of creating and maintaining relationship and connection have to be of central interest and in confident and widespread operation. The very title of this charity refers to the hyphen which connects I to Thou (from the theologian Martin Buber’s book “I and Thou.” It contrasts two polar modes of relating to Other – The mode “I-It”  and the mode “I-Thou”). Maybe, in a rushing world, the only solid ground that remains to us is the precarious slash that joins Me to Thee. This is where we have to build.

    “Even naming the skills of connection  is hard, but practising them is harder still. For now, let us just say that they start from the principle that You are no less the centre of the universe than I am. The Universe speaks through you as crucially and as miraculously as it speaks through me. Therefore we need to attend to each other with some care, if not awe. The future of at least this part of the Universe may depend on how well and truthfully we make connection.”

    You can read the rest of the report here (seven sides of A4. Easy). And if you have time, go here and here as well.

    “Here” number two is refered to in the report. It’s a short article, a slightly shorter version of which was published almost exactly a year ago by the magazine “OpenMind” (now sadly defunct, I’ve just heard). It was a piece that I really had to screw myself up to write and I took months and months over it. It was a real relief to have said it out and I waited in trepidation for the storm I thought (and perhaps half-hoped) might follow. But not a ripple. Not a whisper.

    “Here” number three is perhaps even angrier. And only a bit longer. And certainly as carefully thought through and – in my opinion – even more urgently significant.

    Both pieces have been up on the Hyphen-21 website for nearly a year. And not a ripple of reaction. Not a whisper.

    What am I doing wrong ?

    Posted:


  • Talking of Art – why write poetry ?

    Someone asked me recently for my thoughts on why  I still seem to write poetry, despite everything. This was my reply :

    I think a lot of your day can flood out your sense of self. Writing a poem is a way of restoring your own distinctness and boundaries. The world can silence you. The poem, written on a blank page where there is no competition and no noise, restores your voice, is an answer back.

    We all need a voice, and coupled to that, a way of making sense of what’s going on. Like you, I think even if no one hears your voice, the writing process is restorative, and one can always mutter one’s own words to oneself when the going gets rough.

    I had a moving conversation once with someone suffering extreme but chronic back pain. It destroyed her capacity to work and was often so bad she would vomit. She felt the pain was changing who she was and in a sense replacing her with itself. She decided to make a sculpture of her pain. It made her feel better. Instead of her pain shaping her, she had now shaped her pain. She had restored herself to a proper balance. It’s a good image for any artist, I’d have thought.

    But having ways of getting your voice heard makes things even better. All the poems I write are meant for the air, for declamation, me reciting to an audience, rather than for the page, where it’s just the words singing (or rumbling or muttering or whatever) inside a stranger’s head.

    That declamatory element can be a weakness and I know there’s quite a lot of me that wants my poems to save the world, just as I myself want to save it. Oh come on, I say, from my poetry pulpit. Listen to this. It will do you good. It will make you be good. So the poem becomes preachy and uncentred. And yet…

    There’s the “Poet as Shaman” school which regards the poet as a kind of seer for the community at large. I’m highly suspicious of that approach, yet the fact remains that it grabs me quite a lot. Certainly there is more to the business than just self and restoring one’s own boundaries and systems. One’s day is spent vulnerable and at the mercy of other systems and currents besides one’s own, and I think we are all particularly vulnerable and drawn to that which is unsaid, unrecognised, unspeakable. The more frightened we are of it, the shadowy demon in the cave, the more healing it would be to bring it into the light, and I think there’s an instinct to wrestle with the unspoken, to make sense of it, to chip out the words for it.

    Maybe the real poet’s need to articulate and make sense of things, to restore self, can also involve being the community’s lightening conductor, truth teller, dragon-slayer. Or victim. “Thank you for saying the words I could not say myself but needed to hear and thereby share in” Or “How dare you say what we don’t want to hear, or want our cowering population to hear. To silence you, we’ll rip you to bits. To silence you we’ll put you in prison. To silence you we’ll simply pretend you did not speak.”

    I like your community idea as well. Community implies connection between people, and poetry is about making connection particularly vivid and electric. Therefore community lives wherever a poem hits the mark.

    I was once asked to write a poem about a tree-planting. The local member of parliament trundled along to put down a few spadefuls of soil in the park, around this little tree, and I read my poem to the assembled company.

    Two park gardeners were waiting to settle the tree in properly once the ceremonials were over and we’d all gone away.

    At the end of my poem one of the gardeners asked me for a copy of it. That was a good moment. The poem had ceased to be “art” restricted to arts pages and the like-minded, and became instead community, reaching out in any direction and finding a home where it may…

    Posted:


  • And what is Art for, then ?

    For the first time on this blog, on this New Year’s Day, I want simply to report on something I did recently. I’m proud of it, but am also still absorbing what it meant.

    Half way through December, I ran a “Mental Health Arts” evening in a church assembly room, part of an inner-city church badly damaged during the Second World War . The event was funded by the local NHS under the heading of “Mental Health Promotion”

    It was an evening full of world premieres and massive personal transition and risk. Several pieces of music were played by professionals and this was the first time – aside from the rehearsals – that even their composer had  heard any of his music played “live” –  let alone anyone else. Likewise, the drama piece – not just the first time it had ever been performed anywhere, but the first time the playwright had ever heard his words outside his own head. And the photographer – his amazing pictures kept under his bed for years, the negatives destroyed long ago, and he adamant that he will never take another photograph in his life.

    I should say that the composer, the playwright, the photographer and two of the poets are all in in receipt of psychiatric services of various kinds, long-term and ongoing.

    The programme lasted two and a half hours, the odd half being an interval in the middle, with hot food provided. The even hours on either side were varied, with the music scattered across both of them in short bursts, the play taking up 40 minutes up until the interval and each of the three poets reading for 15 minutes.

    70 people were in the audience, I think, though well over 100 had booked a seat (had they all turned up, we wouldn’t have coped, perhaps, as the room was full). Most were mental health professionals, though a significant proportion were users of local mental health services, including patients of an in-patient unit.

    I think it was a special and unusually rich event for the following reasons : the general high quality ; the spread, variety and creative inter-play of art media ; the inclusion and powerful articulation of the mental health aspect, overt in the poetry  and in the play ; and the richness and electricity of contact between performer and performer and between performers and audience. Thus, one of the poems I read out had been put to music by the composer and was played straight after I had read it ; furthermore, it had been written in celebration of the birth of someone’s first child, and that someone was present in the audience. The composer had put someone else’s poem to music (both words and music very powerful and referring to suicide) and in this case too we heard the words first, read by the poet, and then the song that was  made of it, sung by a good professional tenor.

    I think it’s fair to say that the concept for the evening came from the many years I have spent in one locality, as service user support worker, using ears and eyes, and winning trust.

    The composer has been writing serious music, in his tiny bed-sit, for the past 26 years. Very very few people know that about him, but after years of knowing me, he shared his “secret” with me and eventually I heard some of the music digitally on computer. Likewise the playwright. He is writing all the time, at all hours in the 24, and has 45 unpublished plays in his flat. Eventually he showed me one of them (about mental health) and I saw its beauty and power and suggested an excerpt that seemed to stand out. I suppose what galvanised me most was the life-long masking of these talents, these statements, this witness, hidden behind the mental health label.

    The photographer too. He dropped those wonderful scruffy black and white prints onto the table one day, after years of knowing me. He denied any skill in or knowledge of the developing process, though the longer he talked about how he achieved the different pictures, the more his knowledge and skill became clear.

    16 actors, graduates from two well-known drama schools, had expressed interest in acting in the drama piece. On the night, several of them sat in the audience. They had been unsuccessful in the audition, (which did not mean they were less good as actors) but were present because the play and concept had gripped their imaginations and they wanted to see the end-result. They are keen as well to continue meeting next year to explore other possibilities for using drama in the mental health field.

    I should say that my role was a complex one in all this. On the evening itself, I was just the Organiser and in a way the need to concentrate on that aspect deprived me of much that had come before. For instance I had taken part in almost all the drama rehearsals beforehand, several long evenings’ worth, and these had been wonderful. Watching the finished item slowly emerge into the light, with detail filled out, and partly created and made clear  by the rehearsal process itself, was just part of the wonder of it all, though magnificent enough in itself. I was also acutely aware that I had instigated something here that was going to put several people through very intense and even transformative experience over time ; and I needed to take full responsibility for this and  be alert and in support for whatever arose. But what did arise was totally unexpected. Of course I had my eyes mainly on the creators, and took for granted the performers. As things turned out, the creators were fine from beginning to end. But, one of the actors reported afterwards that the part he played had drawn him down into itself, so to speak,  and he had felt increasingly vulnerable and at sea as the rehearsals went on and for a few days after the performance. I failed to pick this up and realised that I should have been alert in all directions  – not just the obvious one. I do not mention my ommission from any great desire for punishment, but as a point of interest and learning, and maybe some irony.

    This was a one-off event, its enlightened funding greatly to the credit of the body concerned.  Feed-back since has been universally upwards of enthusiastic.

    It is tempting to suggest that the programme we put together warrants a professional audio-visual recording, and also further outings, maybe a large number of them, in different venues and localities. For that to happen, more funding would have to be found. But I am quite sure that all the performers involved would be up for it. I certainly would. When I get some energy back, I might have a go at it. Later outings will certainly cost a lot less than this first one did. For instance, the sooner we repeat it, the less lines the actors will have to re-learn !

    I shall (almost) finish this piece with a description of another intense connection that was made that night.

    I read a recent poem of my own – “Augustin Doing Life.” It can be found on this site, sitting like an old smouldering dragon in the basement of the “Poem Bank” (see home page, right hand margin).  I will add here to the preamble at the head of the poem, by saying that the person it is dedicated to, Mary Young, is 85 and was present that night to hear the poem. It was terribly important to her to come. In a way I found slightly awe-inspiring, she saw the reading as the completion of her life’s work, (in bringing Augustin to the public’s attention in however small a way) and also the belated “outing” of her secret self. So this elderly person was in a kind of rapture, but also terrified. It was an intense exchange between us, as I read the thing. As far as I am concerned, the poem is about Mary quite as much as about Augustin, but finally of course it’s about me, and my own sense of going through life largely unpublished, largely invisible. But that night, at least three others  “went public” for the first time as well. All very talented people. All Augustins. All Mary’s. I tried to acknowledge  the link between us all. Maybe my identification with their experience of being masked and locked up for all these years, is where the concept for the evening came from. Maybe we are all to some extent unpublished, largely invisible. What would happen in the world if we weren’t ?

    So finally to “Art.”   I’m usually suspicious of Art, or at least that part of it that tends never to get beyond the Arts festival or Arts section, preserve of the Exquisite Few. But I think “Art” was doing a proper job that night,  galvanising and electrifying the connections that make a community healthy, alive and whole, and which in turn make individuals healthy, alive and whole through being part of it. Artists  and creators were released of their secret hoards and became something new and welcome in their community. Risks were taken and frontiers were crossed, love was ventured and something vibrant and robust went on.

    Posted:


  • Augustin stands…

    Augustin

    sculpture by Dorothy Love at www.dorothylove.co.uk

    proposition

    Posted:


  • What are the “Skills of Love” ? Is it worth trying to name them ?

    Last December,  I ran an arts evening which needed professional actors to perform a short new play. At the audition stage, one of the candidates wrote to me as follows :  “If only the theatre world was run entirely by social workers and mental health professionals ! I hope I can speak for all of us in thanking you for your concern for the actors’ feelings and convenience, something that sadly is rare in our profession.”

    I have now written back to the person as follows :

    “You weren’t dead serious in making that statement [about social workers] but were trying to say something about my initial approach to you all, which for me is important.

    I am honestly not fishing for compliments here. What (I think) I want to do over time is articulate and identify and separate out what consititutes the sort of practice that makes things work between people, that helps people work better together, or want to perfom well, or whatever. The sort of practice that binds people in, or brings them out, in this or that common situation.

    I do believe that all our futures depend on those skills flourishing and spreading. Yet they are also under great threat in these times that need them more than ever. Maybe they are even in retreat.  The Market is surely one cause. Population numbers another. New forms of mass communication maybe another in some way. I’m not saying that things are worse than ever before, though. Only a slight acquaintance with History teaches you they’ve always been pretty bad.

    So is there anything you can identify in the way I approached you that made you say what you said, made the difference you commented on ? As far as I was concerned I was just functioning according to learned experience, and thinking purely pragmatically down lines I assumed I needed to.

    There is this phrase “The Skills of Love” which is one possible English translation of some words used in the Metta Sutra, a Buddist tract on kindness. I would claim social workers and similar care professionals are actually using the skills of love all the time (though few would dare say so).  So is an experienced good parent, although the basic connection between I and Other is obviously different in the two cases. Between Parent and Child, of course, there is the blood-tie and all that personal shared history and “ownership.” Between social worker and client, there is perforce a difference of position and set of parameters, and a necessary degree of  professional detachment. Nevertheless, both social worker and parent are deploying ordinary human relationship skills on the basic premise that Other is innately precious, or of value, as central in the Universe as I am, not merely an object for use.

    So there is attitude as a basis, and then a huge collection of skills available for deployment, which act as the expression of that attitude. And I would say the basic attitude is not some holy state or position of virtue or goodness or piety, but merely a sober recognition of plain reality. But is it worth naming the skills, as best we can, or should we put all our attention, at this late stage in human history, into the attitude ? We’ve failed pretty conclusively on both fronts up to now.

    I hope all this does not sound completely wacky.

    I have been playing with these ideas for years and very very slowly coming to some decisions, however ambivalently, so your comment chimed in to a state of readiness.

    Best wishes

    Rogan Wolf

    Posted:


  • So when’s the Next Post due, then ?

    But how can there be a next when we haven’t even established a starting-point ?

    I suggest that to be afraid of the world ending is pointless now. There is a sense in which the world has ended already. Certainly, the solid orb our parents knew has disappeared, along with the truisms and structures they could turn to as foundation and reference point. All that remains is rush and blur, scarred light and infected wind. Anxiety, doubt. Astonishing invention. And everywhere just me, me, me, howling…

    Nothing is solid. Nothing stands. Everything is over and past even before it has established itself.

    So there is no footing we can take for granted. We all have to keep establishing our footfalls all the time.We have to build them. Until we’ve built something to stand upon, there is only space, and weightlessness in space, and being alone in infinite space.

    In the middle of blur and franticness, in the middle of nowhere, before we can proceed to next, we have to construct a sufficient starting-point ; before leaving our starting-point to reach next, we have to make sure our starting-point will support the weight of our moving off ; before we can go forward we have to create and nurture the ground along which we may advance.

    And none of that is easy. Even starting-points have more than one dimension. You create them by coming at them from unexpected angles. Starting-points are meeting-points, where lines and venturings from various lonely places come together and create some sort of fragile solidity, full of tension and possibility, a point of departure.

    So don’t disturb me this Autumn. Like a spider in the mist, I’m busy. I’m threading together my point of departure, from out of nowhere.

    Posted: